What Nasscom wants changed in the Supreme Court’s draft AI rules
Nasscom urged the Supreme Court to clarify definitions of high-risk AI use and ensure that technical audits do not necessitate source code disclosure in its comments on the draft AI regulations for courts. The industry body supported the overall framework but emphasized the need for clearer implementation guidelines, particularly regarding terms like 'substantial risk of harm' and 'high-risk applications.' The Supreme Court's AI Committee is currently reviewing feedback on the draft, which aims to govern AI use in legal contexts while reserving critical decisions for judges.